IQAC
Planning, monitoring and improving quality, under NAAC guidelines.
The backbone of the quality process
A system improves when it follows a cycle of planning, developing, executing, monitoring and analysing. The Internal Quality Assurance Cell works under NAAC guidelines as the backbone of planning and monitoring the mechanisms that achieve the institute’s vision.
It was established as per NAAC guidelines and started functioning on 16.07.2015. It takes care of the activities needed to improve academic quality from the start of the calendar year, by analysing the previous year’s academic data.
Committee members
- ChairpersonElected for 3 years
- Director
- Principal
- EmployerInvited member
- AlumniInvited member
- ParentInvited member
- HOD, MBAMember
- HOD, MCAMember
- Administrative Officer
Aiming among the best
To provide quality education with research and training, respecting the social and ethical values of the profession, and aiming to stand among the best of global educational institutions by expanding its ability and quality among all stakeholders.
What IQAC works for
- •Fix a strategy or plan in accordance with last year’s academic report.
- •Ensure continuous improvement in the institution’s internal operation.
- •Assure stakeholders, including parents, teachers, staff, employers, alumni and society, of its quality and integrity.
What IQAC has done
- •Internal and external academic audits were carried out and the committee analysed the reports.
- •The academic monitoring committee under IQAC, headed by the academic director, conducted an external peer review.
- •IQAC connected to stakeholders through feedback from students, parents, employees and alumni.
- •Staff performance appraisal forms were analysed.
- •International quality standards were introduced in academic processes.
- •Ongoing professional skills were introduced for students in addition to the academic programme.
- •Operations inside the institute were monitored by the quality monitoring committee under IQAC.
- •Infrastructure required for quality improvement was augmented.
More best practices
- College Committees Thirteen committees headed by professors-in-charge, each with named members.
- E-Governance In-house online system for attendance, tests, accounts and academic performance.
- Peer Audits Senior faculty from other institutes inspect labs, workshops and libraries.